This “science” is not about your data or reasoning, and not about your results - it’s about your ability to get a grant, a title, a university badge. In this post-post-modern era, some things are so post they’re posterior - some parts of science are returning to unscience. His mission (though I don’t think he’s aware of it) appears to be to return us to pre-Enlightenment days when Bishops controlled the public conversation. Lewandowsky’s bread and butter stuff is breaking the central tenet of science - namely, that evidence is more important than opinions. The Conversation recall was funded with $6 million. Cheers! Private money couldn’t fund a satire like “ The Conversation”. There’s a mindset, a world view here that’s profoundly unreal, anti-science, and of course, fully funded by the Taxpayer from start to end (how could it be any other way?).įrom the researcher who holds childish assumptions and misunderstands his own results, to the site that posts it all as if it were “higher thought”, to the trained communicator of science who then parrots the mistakes and insults half the population at the same time. Get Laughs, Get Attention, Get Your Message Across.The Wong Fielding Meeting on Global Warming - Documents.Odour reduction practices at Narrogin Beef Producers.Western Australian State Government email list.
Australian Elected Representatives – Emails and phones.Thermometer selection (mystery loss of data).The 800 year lag in CO2 after temperature – graphed.ClimateGate: Thirty Years in the Making (Edition 1.1).The evidence that AGW fans need to provide.
0 kommentar(er)
